Archive for Logan County

Representative Jason Murphey has written a article on his blog site www.housedistrict32.com about County Commissioners standing up to business as usual spending by the legislature.  Commissioner Cleveland of Cleveland County, Commissioner Sharpton of Logan County and Mayor Poland of Jones has questioned $16 million to be directed to ACOG to Oklahoma Medical Research and Jim Thorpe Association. 

SB153_ENR

Senator Randy Brodon has asked for an Attorney General’s opinion on this matter. 

August 13, 2009

The Honorable W.A. Edmondson Attorney General
 313 N.E. 21st Street
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105
Mr. Attorney General:
Please issue your official opinion in response to the following questions:

1. On May 26, 2009 the 1st Regular Session of the 52nd Oklahoma Legislature passed Enrolled Senate Bill 153, and on June 1, 2009 Governor Brad Henry enacted with his signature the provisions of Enrolled Senate Bill 153. Are the provisions of Enrolled Senate Bill 153 which direct the Association of Central Oklahoma Governments to ‘facilitate capital improvements’ with the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation consistent with all of the sections of the Oklahoma State Constitution?
2. If the answer to the prior question is no, then, what action can be taken to insure that all of the provisions of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma are being followed in this matter?
I would appreciate your response at the earliest possible date.
Respectfully, RANDY BROGDON District 34

Categories : Cleveland County, State
Comments (0)

In Thursday’s Association of Central Oklahoma Governments’ Board meeting, the debate was alive and well. For the most part these meetings are reasonably mundane with reoccurring items that need to be approved monthly, such as monthly budgeted expenditures, transportation funding updates and presentations.

The Association of Central Oklahoma Governments (ACOG) is a voluntary association of city, town and county governments within the Central Oklahoma area. The ACOG region includes Oklahoma, Cleveland, Canadian and Logan Counties.

ACOG’s purpose is to aid local governments in planning for common needs, cooperating for mutual benefit and coordinating for sound regional development. ACOG is an organization of, by and for local governments that allows member entities to work in partnership to address issues or problems common to many jurisdictions. This regional cooperation serves to strengthen both the individual and collective capabilities of local governments.

However, on the August 13th agenda there was item up for consideration to authorize the Executive Director to execute a contract with the Department of Commerce to facilitate funding projects for the Oklahoma Medical Research and the Jim Thorpe Association in the amount of $15 million and $1 million respectively. This is not the first time that a request has been asked by the legislature to direct ACOG to receive and payout tax payer money to a pre-named entity public or private.

Commissioner Cleveland of Cleveland County asks, “is this legal to indirectly fund a private organization with public dollars. It seems to me if something is illegal to directly do it. Then it would equally be illegal to indirectly do it.” Mark Sharpton, Logan County Commissioner agreed stating that because it has been done like this in the past does not mean that it is right to do it now or in the future.

Mayor Ray Poland of Jones made the motion to table the item until ACOG could get an Attorney General’s opinion. The item was successfully tabled to next month’s meeting. However, Attorney General’s opinions usually take more than a month and especially since the current AG is basically a lame duck and in campaign mode for Governor this opinion may take longer.

Commissioner Cleveland, Commissioner Sharp and Mayor Poland have valid concerns with this Oklahoma business as usual. The three main concerns are:

· If the state legislator cannot directly appropriate money to an entity, then can they indirectly do it through ACOG?

· Can the state legislator appropriate publicly collected tax dollars and directed it to a private organization whether for profit or not for profit?

· In a time of budget short falls, how can the state afford these kinds of discretionary spending?

“The state treasurer has been telling us for the past six months of under projections of revenue for the state. I just heard today that state agencies were ask to take cuts in their budgets. Commissioners were told that there was just no room in the budget  for additional maintenance and operations funding for their highway districts and then something like this comes up,” said Commissioner Cleveland after the meeting. He and Commissioner Sharpton stated that they do not have anything against OMR or the Jim Thorpe Association but this is a matter of clarification. If this is a legal use of public funds and if ACOG is to be used this way.

It is great to have elected officials that will responsibly question things like this. I will anxiously be waiting on the opinion of the Attorney General on this matter. Until then I hope the item can continue to be tabled.

Categories : Cleveland County, State
Comments (1)
Aug
04

Dealing With The Federal Bureaucracy

Posted by: Roadman | Comments (1)

Below is a nice article by State Representative Jason Murphey in Logan County.

Last week, Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn made a point of exposing the horrendous misuse of our gas tax dollars. Each time you buy gas, you pay about 18 cents per gallon which is remitted to the federal government. This money is supposed to be used to build and repair roads. Coburn explained that a third of this money is being used for items such as scenic beautification, bike paths, pedestrian walkways, transportation museums and environmental concerns.

Coburn’s testimony matches with what our local officials experience on a regular basis. You can only imagine how frustrating it is for local leaders who are fighting a desperate battle to repair roads to see how money is siphoned off for these superfluous purposes — while the roads go unfunded.

Not only are our federal tax dollars inappropriately spent, but the funds that are allowed to come back to state and local government for paving roads do so with horrible, bureaucratic, one-size-fits-all controls that handicap local leaders.

An example of this is the upcoming re-pavement of Broadway Road. Logan County received funding for the road in part because it experiences an extremely heavy traffic count (6000 per day) which is wearing away the road surface. However, federal red tape won’t let the county use this money to pave the road where the heaviest traffic is located.

A federal rule requires that a road this busy cannot be paved with federal funds unless it is widened and shoulder space is added. The amount of funding does not come close to allowing these types of improvements to occur. This means the road will be repaved farther to the north where the widening is not necessary and the need for re-paving is not nearly as strong.

Because of this federal rule, well-meaning though it may be, the worst part of the road cannot be fixed while the part of the road that is not so needy will receive a very nice repaving job. This means the county must scramble to find a way to fix the heavily traveled part of the road with other funding sources.

Recently, county officials from the central Oklahoma region were called into a training session where they were coached on the rules they should abide by because they receive federal funds (money they took from us through the federal gas tax). An example of one of these rules is a Title VI rule requiring local governments to produce materials in multiple languages. You can only image how infuriating it is for county officials who want to make improvements such as paving roads to be told that instead of doing this, they have to spend money producing their documents in foreign languages.

Another point of contention between federal and county government is the fact that county government is required to produce an environmental impact study for events as simple as the placement of a road sign. What kind of world do we live in when taxpayers have to pay for an environmental study just to put up a sign?

In my view, Oklahoma would be far better off by refusing to participate in this ridiculous system and stop remitting gas tax money to the federal government. Those funds would be used much more efficiently if they were simply sent directly to ODOT and the local governments without the federal filter allowing the federal government to dictate their agenda.

Comments (1)